Please Note This forum exists for community support for the Mango product family and the Radix IoT Platform. Although Radix IoT employees participate in this forum from time to time, there is no guarantee of a response to anything posted here, nor can Radix IoT, LLC guarantee the accuracy of any information expressed or conveyed. Specific project questions from customers with active support contracts are asked to send requests to support@radixiot.com.

ByteQueue is in the seroUtils.jar file, which is not open source. You shouldn't really need it since it's just a utility class anyway.

Awesome :D

Serotonin has done multiple projects building access to specific devices, including various models of the FX. Web services are a relatively straightforward way of exchanging information. I recommend using M2M2 so that a specific data source module can be built for your purposes.

I think this is more a networking issue rather than a BACnet or BACnet4j issue. What I would do is create a seperate network with only the devices you want to broadcast to, and put in a gateway/route to the rest of the network to provide connectivity if you require it.

You are correct. A fix has been checked in.

Duplicate post.

You can contact Serotonin for information about how to license the products in a more LGPL kind of way.

I solved my problem. I have changed the prameter of PropertyIdentifier.maxSegmentsAccepted. I setted it to 5. Because of I have got alot of objects.

I committed a change to IpMessageControl that will provide a better exception message than the NPE. Please build from the latest source and give it another try.

Thank you Pine for your solution, though I do not understand why it needs so. :wink:

I don't have the code in front of me, but yes, i believe just sending a null priority will do the trick.

No worries. Thanks for following up.

No worries and thanks.

Thanks Matt :D

@joolz said: What a coincidence, ... hi, thanks for testing :-) regards robert

Thanks Robert. This is been added in similar form to the code base. It imposed a difference to the public interface in LocalDevice though, in that the getAddress method now take an InetAddress parameter. The equivalent code is now: d.getAddress(d.getDefaultLocalInetAddress()) All code changes have been checked into CVS.

The Java is doing simple unack ReadProperty and Write Property (mainly to Present Values of AV, BV, and MSV).

I might, but i have no information to go on.

Yep, everything is fine now, thanks! (Could be think about it myself)

Hi Matthew!, Playing with services, I have discovered a potential none expected behaviour, with the list of remote devices of a local device. First, this list can contain remotes devices doubles. For example, try this : localDevice.sendBroadcast(0xBAC0, new WhoIsRequest(null, null)); localDevice.sendBroadcast(0xBAC0, new WhoIsRequest(null, null)); for (RemoteDevice d : localDevice.getRemoteDevices()) { System.out.println("Device found : " + d); } Moreover, I do not think it is normal to always have the full remote devices list available, after a call of WhoHasRequest method : localDevice.sendBroadcast(0xBAC0, new WhoIsRequest(null, null)); localDevice.sendBroadcast(0xBAC0,new WhoHasRequest(null, new ObjectIdentifier(ObjectType.binaryInput, 4097))); for (RemoteDevice d : localDevice.getRemoteDevices()) { System.out.println("Device found : " + d); } In conclusion, we always add remote devices in the list. Therefore, can we imagine to add code for cleaning the remote devices list, before each call of WhoIsRequest, WhoHasRequest, etc. ? Thank you in advance! Jérémie