• Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Register
    • Login

    Please Note This forum exists for community support for the Mango product family and the Radix IoT Platform. Although Radix IoT employees participate in this forum from time to time, there is no guarantee of a response to anything posted here, nor can Radix IoT, LLC guarantee the accuracy of any information expressed or conveyed. Specific project questions from customers with active support contracts are asked to send requests to support@radixiot.com.

    Radix IoT Website Mango 3 Documentation Website Mango 4 Documentation Website Mango 5 Documentation Website

    High priority task nosql was rejected

    User help
    3
    17
    3.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jmatos
      last edited by

      Hi
      Now and then I got the message:
      "High priority task: com.infiniteautomation.nosql.MangoNoSqlBatchWriteBehindManager$PointDataCleaner was rejected because it is already running."
      Is this in any case a message to worry about? What it means?
      Thanks in advance,
      José

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • phildunlapP
        phildunlap
        last edited by

        Hi Jose,

        That's not anything to worry about it if pops up every now and again. If you're seeing them on a very regular basis, you can try increasing the point clean interval in the NoSQL system settings. If that doesn't help, then it may point to a large issue.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jmatos
          last edited by jmatos

          Hi Phildunlap,

          I'm afraid it does not help... I increase the point interval to 10000ms and the alarm message still appears to much times. The last time I took a look I have more than 300 messages in one hour.

          Also - and I report it to you here because I suspect it have something to do to - (I remind you that this in now in real environment in the client facilities):

          A) The Mango appears to be "stoped"(?!). The regular database backup that took place at 00:05 was not done but the configuration backup was. I try to login and there was always a time out error. I try the Webmin and I was able to login. Finaly I turn the Odroid off and on again and the login to Mango was OK.

          B) Is there a way to compact (maintenance) the database?

          C) Is mandatory to do/enable the NoSQL database backup?

          Thanks in advance,
          José

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • phildunlapP
            phildunlap
            last edited by

            A) is your NoSQL module up to date? What version of Mango and the NoSQL module is this?

            B) No, purging data is the only way to shrink the NoSQL database currently.

            C) No, you can configure NoSQL backups on the /system_settings.shtm page in the NoSQL section.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jmatos
              last edited by

              Hi Phildunlap,

              Answer to your questions:

              • Version of mangoNoSqlDatabase 1.3.5 - paid

              • Version of core 2.8.6 build 606 - paid

              If an update is needed please send me the files to do it offline (also with the procedure) because the client facilities are on a secure network without access to the Internet.

              Last time on the spot I collect more information I think it maybe useful for you to diagnose what could be wrong...

              A) It seems that now and then an alarm from a point on the BACnet does not arrive to MANGO. We could not see the alarm on, but then the alarm off appears correctly.

              B) The MANGO log presents alarms with erros reading the several BACnet Fire Centrals and then Return To Normal.

              C) There are 8 BACnet Fire Centrals with several hundreds points each one. The update period is set to 6 seconds in each one.

              D) Rarely MANGO (3 times) presents me the message "TIME OUT".

              E) Now and then when I told MANGO to do a Backup the BACnet Server reports the Client (MANGO) is lost. Once Backup finishes, status OK.

              Thanks in advance,
              Jose

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • phildunlapP
                phildunlap
                last edited by

                Hi jmatos,

                You can download the files you need to do a manual update from our store site, https://store.infiniteautomation.com

                B) What errors? Can you provide the exact message?

                C) That should be fine, but you can see the poll times on the data source's edit page in the Runtime Status section.

                D) Please provide the entire, exact error message. Matthew (BACnet4J's original author and still maintainer) recently did a fair bit of work on BACnet4J and some on the BACnet data source recently, and I know one this that got better was the stability of polling a data source with many devices, some in communication and some not reachable. If you use the latest Mango and BACnet you would be using this code.

                E) This could perhaps be remedied by increasing the timeouts on the local device. Which kind of backup? NoSQL, Database or configuration?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jmatos
                  last edited by jmatos

                  Hi Phildunlap

                  In the update, do I need to worry about the licence or its automatically recognized?

                  B) 'CDI5': Read properties from device at 192.168.1.105:47808 failed: Completed 1 requests. Excepted on: ReadPropertyMultipleRequest[ListOfReadAcc... ... ...

                  This is by heart and the text goes on and on... present info from all the points over that BACnet FireCentral. I could sent you the exact message the next time I went to the client.

                  Thanks and have a nice week-end,
                  Jose

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • phildunlapP
                    phildunlap
                    last edited by

                    Your license will only be affected if you're changing the major version of the core, so updating from Mango 2 to Mango 3 requires updating your license.

                    I would encourage you to try the latest BACnet module for Mango 3, as Matthew has made improvements, as I was referring to in my previous post.

                    It is most likely a device is not available.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jmatos
                      last edited by

                      Is that meaning that I can install the BACnet module for Mango 3 in the 2.8.8 Core?

                      Thanks,
                      Jose

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JoelHaggarJ
                        JoelHaggar
                        last edited by

                        No, you need to have the latest Mango 3 Core and the BACnet module. There have been several improvements and bug fixes in this so it's work updating. You can contact support@infiniteautomation.com to see if you can qualify for a free upgrade or get a quote on an upgrade for your existing license.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jmatos
                          last edited by

                          Before I step into an upgrade, I would like to know if the BACnet Datasource interrogates (or/and bind) all the points/objects in the correspondent remote device or only the ones that are effectively create/present as DataPoint ?

                          Thank you very much,
                          Jose

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • phildunlapP
                            phildunlap
                            last edited by

                            The data source only subscribes to points it has been configured to subscribe to, and the poll only asks for points that have been configured as well.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jmatos
                              last edited by

                              Hi Phildunlap

                              Thanks for your quick reply.
                              So having us now several datasources is for any chance recommended to aggregate all the point in a single one (we now have 8)? If so is there any quick task to import all the points to a single one?

                              Thank you,
                              Jose

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                jmatos
                                last edited by

                                sorry to insist. Do you have any answer to me?
                                Thank you,
                                Jose

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • phildunlapP
                                  phildunlap
                                  last edited by

                                  Hi jmatos,

                                  I was away. Here's a thread that gives instructions on how to move data points between data sources: https://forum.infiniteautomation.com/topic/2055/changing-datasource-of-datapoint/3

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    jmatos
                                    last edited by

                                    So, do you recommend to move the 1.800 points existing between 8 data source a single one?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • phildunlapP
                                      phildunlap
                                      last edited by

                                      I would expect it to be slightly different, you can try, but the recommendation we made was to update to the latest BACnet in Mango 3.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post