• Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Register
    • Login

    Please Note This forum exists for community support for the Mango product family and the Radix IoT Platform. Although Radix IoT employees participate in this forum from time to time, there is no guarantee of a response to anything posted here, nor can Radix IoT, LLC guarantee the accuracy of any information expressed or conveyed. Specific project questions from customers with active support contracts are asked to send requests to support@radixiot.com.

    Radix IoT Website Mango 3 Documentation Website Mango 4 Documentation Website Mango 5 Documentation Website

    Error

    User help
    3
    10
    4.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jjconti
      last edited by

      I'm getting this data source alarm: 'COM1': Exception from modbus master: invalid message start: 48

      I've a, ASCII serial modbus device (builted by us). I've used a serial port sniffer and the received data is correct. If I change the device for a software simulator, the error does not happen.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mlohbihler
        last edited by

        Can you send the message traces? I'll try them here.

        Best regards,
        Matthew

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jjconti
          last edited by

          Do you mean the output from the mango termianl?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            mlohbihler
            last edited by

            No. You said to used a serial port sniffer. That's the data i'd need.

            Best regards,
            Matthew

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              pepefrund
              last edited by

              These are the messages of the sniffer:

              Mango query -> :010100000002FC\r\n
              Device response -> :01010101FC\r\n

              Mango query -> :010300000008F4\r\n
              Device response -> :010310009100000000000000000000000000005B\r\n

              Can be overwriting the receive FIFO? Can you add the message received with errors in the log of mango?
              Thanks

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                mlohbihler
                last edited by

                Well, there's nothing wrong with the messages. Where does the error occur? On every req/res, or just specific ones?

                Best regards,
                Matthew

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  pepefrund
                  last edited by

                  This type of error is presented from time to time. As we add records errors become more frequent.
                  This is more complex to determine. When using a simulator of a slave on the same PC and with the same records (simulating a serial port), it works perfectly.
                  That is why I consult if there is a possibility that the serial FIFO is overwritten.
                  To better identify the problem, it is necessary that this system log message that gives the error received.
                  The only test that would do is make the simulator work on another PC and the serial port with handshake and without it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    mlohbihler
                    last edited by

                    Have you tried setting the concurrency level to "transport"?

                    Best regards,
                    Matthew

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      pepefrund
                      last edited by

                      When Mango can not interpret the message retry the query. In any of the answers, Mango able to interpret the message and takes it as valid. The problem is that ALL answers are the same but the system fails despite that.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post