unable to discover a bacnet device on my network
-
Yes, I would say the existing BACnet module should work. If it doesn't that implies there may be an issue in the module or your network that should be corrected. A wireshark of 2.8 vs. 3.2 for a data source enabled + discovery would be the most informative way to probe why it isn't working. But, somethings were changed and improved between 4.0.1 and 4.1.2 of BACnet4J, so perhaps updating is all that is actually required.
-
Hi Phil,
I try to connect to webmin( port 10000).
What is the factory default password ?
Thanks
Mircea -
I found it ....
-
Hi Phil,
I update the Bacnet as you suggested but no luck . Same issue, I can't discover the controller.
I am not familiar with wireshark but I will try.
This is what I get after restarting mango with bacnet 4.1.2
I am able to see the other Mango ES as a bacnet device.
Thanks
Mircea -
Hi Phil,
I found that if I change the controller device Id while Mango is in process of sending object list request then Mango catch the controller id and display the list of objects that are on controller.
Hope this help for further investigation.
Thanks
Mircea -
This post is deleted! -
Hi Phil,
Using the trick that I mention previous ( changing the ID of bacnet controller in the same time with the request from Mango to display the objects list) I was able to import the points. The problem is that the data base stop recording after a while.
The Jace2 data base record every minute ( the default settings).
If I stop and restart the data base the points start to record again for a while and stop after.
This is stranger to me. It is not the first time when I use Bacnet but is the first time when I used with Mango V3.
Any idea why . all thous issue ?
Thanks
Mircea -
Hi Phil,
Here are the requested wireshark.[1_1516049331191_Bacnet MANGO v3.pcapng](Uploading 100%) [0_1516049331189_Bacnet MANGO v2_8.pcapng](Uploading 100%)
Please let me know what I need to do.
Thanks
Mircea -
Mircea,
Can you email those into support@infiniteautomation.com ? Thanks
-
Surprisingly, resolution was found in slightly different Local Device settings, specifically he had to use the broadcast address that was proper for the network and the sink address to bind. So, in this instance, bind address 0.0.0.0 and broadcast address 192.168.1.255