New adjust:
Update period = 50ms
Timeout (ms) = 100ms
retries 2
test with Modbus read data: No response from slave 1
Enable Data Source and Data Points with 1 slave and work fine.
Enable Data Source and Data Points with 2 or 3 slaves and i get the follow message:
'Data Source': com.serotonin.modbus4j.exception.ModbusTransportException: com.serotonin.messaging.TimeoutException: request=com.serotonin.modbus4j.serial.rtu.RtuMessageRequest@42ea05a3
get updated readings in 2 second
changing retries = 0
sometimes with any munber of slave , when i set some data point, the message triggers again.
get updated readings in 1 second
In the slave, all routines are executed in 20ms.

My Modbus serial to have the following configuration:
57600 bps
8 data bits
Even parity
1 stop bit
rtu
Slave 1 has the following parameters:
10 input register
5 holding register
2 coil status
1 input status
polling the network as follows:
update = 1s = 500ms timeout retries = 2
So this works fine, and get updated readings in 1 second, then i created the slave 2 with only 1 holding register, but do not have the slave 2 connected to network. I observed that the rate of reading (new value) in the first slave increased to 4 seconds on average.
I considered the following hypothesis: as no slave 2 connected on the network takes poolling:
retries (2) * timeout (500ms) = 1 second, so would expect a value slightly greater than 1 second, but I get 4 seconds.
Decreases update for 100ms and after several attempts, tests via Modbus read date, could decrease the timeout to 300ms, again for the first slave everything works fine, but when the active slave 2 (the one holding register), the rate of slave 1 increases for 4 seconds.
I consider polling the network equal to the number of slaves by update (all connected slaves and enabled)?
My hypothesis is correct? Why the discrepancy when a slave does not respond?
My goal is to poll the network complete in 1 second, if any slave network for some reason loses connection to scan rate goes to 4 seconds degrading much time to scan desired. Any idea to work around that?

I appreciate any help.

My Modbus serial to have the following configuration:
57600 bps
8 data bits
Even parity
1 stop bit
rtu
Slave 1 has the following parameters:
10 input register
5 holding register
2 coil status
1 input status
polling the network as follows:
update = 1s = 500ms timeout retries = 2
So this works fine, and get updated readings in 1 second, then i created the slave 2 with only 1 holding register, but do not have the slave 2 connected to network. I observed that the rate of reading (new value) in the first slave increased to 4 seconds on average.
I considered the following hypothesis: as no slave 2 connected on the network takes poolling:
retries (2) * timeout (500ms) = 1 second, so would expect a value slightly greater than 1 second, but I get 4 seconds.
Decreases update for 100ms and after several attempts, tests via Modbus read date, could decrease the timeout to 300ms, again for the first slave everything works fine, but when the active slave 2 (the one holding register), the rate of slave 1 increases for 4 seconds.
I consider polling the network equal to the number of slaves by update (all connected slaves and enabled)?
My hypothesis is correct? Why the discrepancy when a slave does not respond?
My goal is to poll the network complete in 1 second, if any slave network for some reason loses connection to scan rate goes to 4 seconds degrading much time to scan desired. Any idea to work around that?

I appreciate any help.