• Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Register
    • Login

    Please Note This forum exists for community support for the Mango product family and the Radix IoT Platform. Although Radix IoT employees participate in this forum from time to time, there is no guarantee of a response to anything posted here, nor can Radix IoT, LLC guarantee the accuracy of any information expressed or conveyed. Specific project questions from customers with active support contracts are asked to send requests to support@radixiot.com.

    Radix IoT Website Mango 3 Documentation Website Mango 4 Documentation Website Mango 5 Documentation Website

    Current status of bacnet4j lib?

    BACnet4J general discussion
    2
    3
    2.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      mjh
      last edited by

      Salutations from Australia :-)

      First-up thanks Matthew for the source release. Open source rocks.

      Before we commit to using bacnet4j we have a couple of questions:

      1. how widely has bacnet4j been tested against "real devices"?

      2. do you have a compiled list of existing/known issues with the codebase?

      3. is there a "portfolio" of existing virtual bacnet devices that could be used for testing/learning?

      If you're looking for constructive criticism, the biggest issue(s) we have with your code is the lack of doco... I think the codebase would benefit tremendously from the addition of some documentation to each of the main classes in the library, and some unit/functional tests that work "out of the box".

      Assuming we go with bacnet4j (my boss is concerned about the lack of doco/tests), we would be interested in returning our fixes/improvements/tests/etc back to sourceforge if you're interested.

      regards,
      Matt

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mlohbihler
        last edited by

        Hi Matt,

        First-up thanks Matthew for the source release.

        You're welcome.

        Open source rocks.

        Except for the guy supporting it. In general i don't have the information you are requesting. Not everyone who uses the software tells me so, much less describes how they are using it with detailed equipment lists and such.

        Also, I apologize for the lack of documentation. I'm still waiting on someone who freely uses the software to contribute such a thing back to the project.

        Best regards,
        Matthew

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post