• Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Register
    • Login

    Please Note This forum exists for community support for the Mango product family and the Radix IoT Platform. Although Radix IoT employees participate in this forum from time to time, there is no guarantee of a response to anything posted here, nor can Radix IoT, LLC guarantee the accuracy of any information expressed or conveyed. Specific project questions from customers with active support contracts are asked to send requests to support@radixiot.com.

    Radix IoT Website Mango 3 Documentation Website Mango 4 Documentation Website Mango 5 Documentation Website

    Thanks for PriorityArrays, maybe OutOfService?

    BACnet4J general discussion
    2
    3
    2.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      tripmckay
      last edited by

      Hi, we currently use BACnet4J on our bachelor internship project. Yesterday or so we figured out it didn't already support proper priority handling which kind of upset our customer ;). As we're on a tight schedule for delivery I was relieved to see someone requested this the beginning of this year and you delivered! A big thanks for that one ;D

      So still we wonder why OutOfService is not supported, yet (any pitfalls associated?)? We're going to implement that on ourself for now (see tight schedule == first version on friday).

      But above all I want to thank you for your great work you've done and are doing here!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mlohbihler
        last edited by

        Hi,

        Thanks for your comments. The fact of the matter is that BACnet4J was born out of a need for an operator-side protocol implementation. This is why to date there is device-side functionality that is not implemented. OutOfService remains undone only because no one has yet ask for it - until now.

        When time permits i can take a look at it, but having something for tomorrow is unlikely. If you end up doing it yourself and want to contribute the code back, it would be welcome.

        Best regards,
        Matthew

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post