• Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Register
    • Login

    Please Note This forum exists for community support for the Mango product family and the Radix IoT Platform. Although Radix IoT employees participate in this forum from time to time, there is no guarantee of a response to anything posted here, nor can Radix IoT, LLC guarantee the accuracy of any information expressed or conveyed. Specific project questions from customers with active support contracts are asked to send requests to support@radixiot.com.

    Radix IoT Website Mango 3 Documentation Website Mango 4 Documentation Website Mango 5 Documentation Website

    Why does BACNet4J require Java 1.5 or better ?

    BACnet4J general discussion
    2
    4
    2.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dan01845
      last edited by

      Hello,

      The overview description of the BACNet4J project indicates that this requires Java 1.5 or better: I was wondering if you could detail which features of 1.5 in particular BACNet4J relies on.

      Also if we were interested in porting this to Java 1.4, would you estimate this to be a large amount of work (if at all doable) ?

      Thank you in advance for your answers !

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mlohbihler
        last edited by

        Generics is the biggie. And enums. Also, it uses the seroUtils library which itself needs 1.5, but i don't recall that it uses a lot of features, so separation may be easy. I'd say you might prepare yourself for several days worth of work.

        And, of course, if you get it done, it would be lovely if you submitted your product back to the project.

        Best regards,
        Matthew

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dan01845
          last edited by

          Thank you for the quick reply and the info. Indeed if the organization I belong to did decide to work on a Java 1.4 port, we would hopefully be able to contribute this back to the community.
          Thank you again !

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post