<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[possibility of mango  cluster]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have running  a  scada system base of mango(to be exactly is mango+scadabr), it have 27 thousand points, more than 60 modbus Serial datasources, the serial com is virtual com   use Ethernet  connector  which listening a tcp port  from gprs, 3g,4g ,Ethernet .<br />
I  use mysql database, datasource  update period is 5 mintue, every day  generate  more 7 million pointvalues, so i have to partition  pointvalues table based on  Column(ts),but now the pointvalues have 1.5 billion  values.<br />
the values is  growing day by day,so we have a  idear,if we can build a mango cluster, every server have 10 thousand points, 10 server we can have 100  thousand  points, the  mango cluster have one unify web front,we cory the session  between 10 server,use  haproxy  shunt   post to different server  according to some rules(for example url  parameter). for the end user,he don't feel the different.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mango-os.com/topic/1937/possibility-of-mango-cluster</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 13:15:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.mango-os.com/topic/1937.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:40:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possibility of mango  cluster on Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:54:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Clustering Mango for HA (high availability) and failover would be a great feature and very attractive to enterprise customers I think.</p>
<p dir="auto">Personally, the greater value would be in having redundancy, rather than sharing load (as it seems Mango can scale very well itself anyway).</p>
<p dir="auto">Some network monitoring systems (PRTG?) implement this in a way that means that one node/instance is doing the monitoring, and syncing data to a secondary instance, but if the primary goes down the secondary instantly detects this and takes over polling. When the primary comes back the data is resynced.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mango-os.com/post/10178</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mango-os.com/post/10178</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremyh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:54:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possibility of mango  cluster on Fri, 07 Aug 2015 13:48:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I am trying the HAproxy solution,if it is success ,i will share the functon.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mango-os.com/post/10177</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mango-os.com/post/10177</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hussam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 13:48:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possibility of mango  cluster on Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:49:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Interesting that you bring this up as we just had a technical discussion around this yesterday.  This is indeed possible but would be a fairly large development effort.  We don't have plans to implement it unless we have a serious customer that can cover the development cost but it would open up a lot of interesting possibilities including multi redundant fail over.</p>
<p dir="auto">In the mean time you would benefit greatly from using the Mango Automation Enterprise license with the NoSQL database.  We have other clients with many billions of records in a single database with 10,000 new samples coming in every few seconds.  This is running in an amazon server and performs very well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mango-os.com/post/10176</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mango-os.com/post/10176</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JoelHaggar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:49:28 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>